State v. P. J. H.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. P. J. H.

296 P.3d 663, 255 Or. App. 292

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 13, 2013

DocketM1112048; A150564

StatusPublished

This text of 296 P.3d 663 (State v. P. J. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. P. J. H., 296 P.3d 663, 255 Or. App. 292 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court erred in concluding that she is unable to care for her basic needs as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court erred in concluding that she is unable to care for her basic needs as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 P.3d 663, 255 Or. App. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-p-j-h-orctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack