State v. P. F.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. P. F.

287 P.3d 1280, 252 Or. App. 565, 2012 WL 4449431, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1183

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 26, 2012

Docket110565360; A149020

StatusPublished

This text of 287 P.3d 1280 (State v. P. F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. P. F., 287 P.3d 1280, 252 Or. App. 565, 2012 WL 4449431, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1183 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant appeals a judgment of continued involuntary commitment. ORS 426.307(6). He contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or others. ORS 426.005(1)(e)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support recommitment. We agree and accept the state’s concession; accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant appeals a judgment of continued involuntary commitment. ORS 426.307(6). He contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or others. ORS 426.005(1)(e)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support recommitment. We agree and accept the state’s concession; accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 P.3d 1280, 252 Or. App. 565, 2012 WL 4449431, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-p-f-orctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack