State v. P. F.

289 P.3d 267, 252 Or. App. 563, 2012 WL 4449446, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1178
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 26, 2012·No. C100089MC; A147380·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division on the basis that, because of a mental disorder, appellant is dangerous to himself. ORS 426.130; ORS 426.005(1)(e)(A). He contends that the state failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he presented a danger to himself. The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support involuntary commitment. We agree and accept the state’s concession; accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. P. F., 289 P.3d 267, 252 Or. App. 563, 2012 WL 4449446, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1178 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

289 P.3d 267 (State v. P. F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005