State v. P. C. (In re P. C.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. P. C. (In re P. C.)

428 P.3d 992, 294 Or. App. 295

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 3, 2018·No. A165015·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*296Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him to the custody of the Oregon Healthy Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his only assignment of error, appellant argues, in part, that the record lacked sufficient evidence that he was a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A) and (B). The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to establish that appellant was a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*296Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him to the custody of the Oregon Healthy Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his only assignment of error, appellant argues, in part, that the record lacked sufficient evidence that he was a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A) and (B). The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to establish that appellant was a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

State v. P. C. (In re P. C.), 428 P.3d 992, 294 Or. App. 295 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

428 P.3d 992 (State v. P. C. (In re P. C.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related