State v. P. C. (In re P. C.)
This text of 428 P.3d 992 (State v. P. C. (In re P. C.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*296Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him to the custody of the Oregon Healthy Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his only assignment of error, appellant argues, in part, that the record lacked sufficient evidence that he was a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A) and (B). The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to establish that appellant was a danger to himself or unable to provide for his basic needs. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
428 P.3d 992, 294 Or. App. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-p-c-in-re-p-c-orctapp-2018.