State v. Oxendine

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Oxendine

98 S.E.2d 347, 246 N.C. 457, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 433

DecidedJune 7, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E.2d 347 (State v. Oxendine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Oxendine, 98 S.E.2d 347, 246 N.C. 457, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 433 (N.C. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Cueiam.

The State’s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Hence, the exception and assignment of error directed to the failure of the court below to dismiss as of nonsuit is without merit. Furthermore, the portions of the charge to the jury, to which the defendant has excepted and assigned as error, are in substantial compliance with our decisions bearing on similar instructions.

The defendant has failed to show any error which in our opinion would justify a new trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Cueiam.

The State’s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Hence, the exception and assignment of error directed to the failure of the court below to dismiss as of nonsuit is without merit. Furthermore, the portions of the charge to the jury, to which the defendant has excepted and assigned as error, are in substantial compliance with our decisions bearing on similar instructions.

The defendant has failed to show any error which in our opinion would justify a new trial.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 S.E.2d 347, 246 N.C. 457, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oxendine-nc-1957.