State v. Ownbey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Ownbey

247 N.C. 271

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 27, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 N.C. 271 (State v. Ownbey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ownbey, 247 N.C. 271 (N.C. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Counsel have been diligent in behalf of the defendant in this Court and the record shows they were equally so in the Superior Court. The charge is serious. The punishment is afflictive. However, we find nothing in the record to justify a new trial. For that reason no useful purpose can be served by a discussion of the evidence, except to say that if it is true (and the jury so found), it was sufficient to warrant conviction and to support the judgment.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

Counsel have been diligent in behalf of the defendant in this Court and the record shows they were equally so in the Superior Court. The charge is serious. The punishment is afflictive. However, we find nothing in the record to justify a new trial. For that reason no useful purpose can be served by a discussion of the evidence, except to say that if it is true (and the jury so found), it was sufficient to warrant conviction and to support the judgment.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 N.C. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ownbey-nc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack