State v. Owens

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Owens

230 Mont. 2

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Owens. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 Mont. 135 →

Montana Supreme Court·Decided April 2, 1987·No. No. CDC-86-003·Published

Opinion

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 5 years for Deceptive Practice imposed on August 6, 1986, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

We wish to thank Steve Hagerman, Deputy County Attorney from Cascade County for appearing before the Sentence Review Board on behalf of the State of Montana.

We wish to thank Pete Carroll of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 5 years for Deceptive Practice imposed on August 6, 1986, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

We wish to thank Steve Hagerman, Deputy County Attorney from Cascade County for appearing before the Sentence Review Board on behalf of the State of Montana.

We wish to thank Pete Carroll of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

State v. Owens, 230 Mont. 2 (Mo. 1987).

Pincite

230 Mont. 2 (State v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.