Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Owen

State v. Owen

855 P.2d 1141, 121 Or. App. 665, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1157
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 14, 1993
Docket91-1390; CA A75137
StatusPublished

This text of 855 P.2d 1141 (State v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Owen, 855 P.2d 1141, 121 Or. App. 665, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1157 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged with six offenses. He pled guilty to five of them, and the state dismissed the sixth charge pursuant to a plea agreement that included certain sentencing recommendations. On appeal, defendant challenges the post-prison supervision period imposed. Although the state concedes that the court erred in the manner claimed by defendant, we are foreclosed from reviewing the claimed error. ORS 138.222(2)(d). State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Johnston
851 P.2d 1156 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Kilborn
852 P.2d 935 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
State v. Adams
847 P.2d 397 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
855 P.2d 1141, 121 Or. App. 665, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-owen-orctapp-1993.