State v. Owen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Owen

855 P.2d 1141, 121 Or. App. 665, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1157

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 14, 1993·No. 91-1390; CA A75137·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged with six offenses. He pled guilty to five of them, and the state dismissed the sixth charge pursuant to a plea agreement that included certain sentencing recommendations. On appeal, defendant challenges the post-prison supervision period imposed. Although the state concedes that the court erred in the manner claimed by defendant, we are foreclosed from reviewing the claimed error. ORS 138.222(2)(d). State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged with six offenses. He pled guilty to five of them, and the state dismissed the sixth charge pursuant to a plea agreement that included certain sentencing recommendations. On appeal, defendant challenges the post-prison supervision period imposed. Although the state concedes that the court erred in the manner claimed by defendant, we are foreclosed from reviewing the claimed error. ORS 138.222(2)(d). State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.

State v. Owen, 855 P.2d 1141, 121 Or. App. 665, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1157 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

855 P.2d 1141 (State v. Owen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related