State v. Overton

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Overton

2011 Ohio 740, 128 Ohio St. 3d 353

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 22, 2011

Docket2010-2072

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2011 Ohio 740 (State v. Overton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Overton, 2011 Ohio 740, 128 Ohio St. 3d 353 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant’s eighth assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant’s eighth assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2011 Ohio 740, 128 Ohio St. 3d 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-overton-ohio-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack