State v. Overton
75 N.C. 200
Opinion
We have examined the record and see ím error. We have considered the two points made in the statement of the case as grounds for a venire de novo and are satisfied that neither of them is tenable. In fact both of them are so plain as not to admit of discussion.
This will be certified, to the end that judgment may be pronounced agreeable to law.
Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Overton, 75 N.C. 200 (N.C. 1876).
75 N.C. 200 (State v. Overton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Horton
170 S.E.2d 466 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1969)
State v. Horner
103 S.E.2d 694 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
State v. Mangum
96 S.E.2d 39 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
State v. . Hardee
83 N.C. 619 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)