State v. Overholt

140 So. 3d 995, 2014 WL 2515951
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 5, 2014
DocketNos. SC13-962, SC13-1143
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 So. 3d 995 (State v. Overholt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Overholt, 140 So. 3d 995, 2014 WL 2515951 (Fla. 2014).

Opinion

PERRY, J.

We initially accepted review of the decisions in Overholt v. State, 110 So.3d 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), and Oliver v. State, 125 So.3d 244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), based on direct and express conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. In light of the State’s suggestion of mootness, we dismiss review of the decision in Overholt as moot. Additionally, upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in Oliver. Accordingly, we [996]*996discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, CANADY, and LABARGA, JJ., concur. LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vance Jerome Farmer v. State of Florida
180 So. 3d 1058 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 So. 3d 995, 2014 WL 2515951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-overholt-fla-2014.