Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Overholser

State v. Overholser

62 N.E.3d 178, 147 Ohio St. 3d 165
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 2016·No. No. 2015-0956·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Lanzinger and Kennedy, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Overholser, 62 N.E.3d 178, 147 Ohio St. 3d 165 (Ohio 2016).

62 N.E.3d 178 (State v. Overholser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
2016 Ohio 1002 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)