State v. Ovechka
This text of 922 A.2d 1099 (State v. Ovechka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 99 Conn. App. 679 (AC 26077), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state’s evidence of the defendant’s repeated spraying of the victim in the eyes, face, clothing and body with weed killer and/or pepper spray, and of the victim’s eye and skin injuries, was insufficient to prove the use of a ‘dangerous instrument’ within the meaning of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2) (assault in the second degree) and General Statutes § 53a-3 (7)?”
ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
922 A.2d 1099, 282 Conn. 909, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ovechka-conn-2007.