State v. . Outlaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Outlaw

196 S.E. 332, 213 N.C. 428, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 108

DecidedApril 13, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 196 S.E. 332 (State v. . Outlaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Outlaw, 196 S.E. 332, 213 N.C. 428, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 108 (N.C. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendants were charged in the bill of indictment with rape. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of the felony of rape as to each of the defendants, and thereupon sentence of death was pronounced as to each of the defendants. The defendants docketed their appeal, but did not file brief with the clerk of this Court by 12 o’clock noon on the second Saturday preceding the call of the Sixth District, or at any time subsequent thereto.

The Attorney-General moves to dismiss the appeal. This motion must be allowed. Rule 28 of Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 200 N. C., 831-2. However, according to the usual custom of this Court in capital cases, we have examined the record to see if any error appears. In the record we find no error, the judgment is affirmed and the

Appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendants were charged in the bill of indictment with rape. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of the felony of rape as to each of the defendants, and thereupon sentence of death was pronounced as to each of the defendants. The defendants docketed their appeal, but did not file brief with the clerk of this Court by 12 o’clock noon on the second Saturday preceding the call of the Sixth District, or at any time subsequent thereto.

The Attorney-General moves to dismiss the appeal. This motion must be allowed. Rule 28 of Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 200 N. C., 831-2. However, according to the usual custom of this Court in capital cases, we have examined the record to see if any error appears. In the record we find no error, the judgment is affirmed and the

Appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 S.E. 332, 213 N.C. 428, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-outlaw-nc-1938.