State v. Outlaw
763 A.2d 1036, 255 Conn. 910, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 439
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 29, 2000
DocketSC 16432
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 763 A.2d 1036 (State v. Outlaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Outlaw, 763 A.2d 1036, 255 Conn. 910, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 439 (Colo. 2000).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 515 (AC 19284), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant had not completed the probation portion of his April 4, 1986 sentence when the arrest warrant for violation of probation was issued on June 19, 1998?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Outlaw
772 A.2d 1122 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
763 A.2d 1036, 255 Conn. 910, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-outlaw-conn-2000.