State v. Otts
This text of State v. Otts (State v. Otts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
The State, Petitioner,
v.
Steven Otts, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2018-001671
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Saluda County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 27880 Heard April 17, 2019 – Filed April 24, 2019
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody J. Brown, Assistant Attorney General J. Anthony Mabry and Assistant Attorney General Susannah R. Cole, all of Columbia and Solicitor S.R. Hubbard, III, of Lexington, for Petitioner
Appellate Defender Susan B. Hackett, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIUM: We granted certiorari to review whether the court of appeals erred in reversing the trial court and remanding for a new trial. State v. Otts, 424 S.C. 150, 817 S.E.2d 540 (Ct. App. 2018). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Otts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-otts-sc-2019.