State v. Ott

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Ott

605 P.2d 973, 100 Idaho 795, 1980 Ida. LEXIS 461

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided February 6, 1980·No. No. 13452·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The defendant respondent Ott moved to dismiss the appeal filed by the prosecuting attorney of Payette County from an order of the district court dated July 26, 1979, which apparently terminated the above entitled criminal action. Although the notice of appeal was filed on August 29, 1979, the Attorney General of the State of Idaho has not participated by joining in said notice of appeal pursuant to his statutory authority under I.C. § 67 — 1401(1). Therefore the Court concludes that the appeal is not authorized by the Attorney General and is therefore dismissed.

BISTLINE, J., dissents, noting also that the dismissal entered by the Court is not on the grounds raised by Ott’s motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The defendant respondent Ott moved to dismiss the appeal filed by the prosecuting attorney of Payette County from an order of the district court dated July 26, 1979, which apparently terminated the above entitled criminal action. Although the notice of appeal was filed on August 29, 1979, the Attorney General of the State of Idaho has not participated by joining in said notice of appeal pursuant to his statutory authority under I.C. § 67 — 1401(1). Therefore the Court concludes that the appeal is not authorized by the Attorney General and is therefore dismissed.

BISTLINE, J., dissents, noting also that the dismissal entered by the Court is not on the grounds raised by Ott’s motion.

State v. Ott, 605 P.2d 973, 100 Idaho 795, 1980 Ida. LEXIS 461 (Idaho 1980).

Pincite

605 P.2d 973 (State v. Ott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related