State v. Otis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Otis

589 So. 2d 487, 1991 La. LEXIS 3129, 1991 WL 242137

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 15, 1991

DocketNo. 91-K-2183

StatusPublished

This text of 589 So. 2d 487 (State v. Otis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Otis, 589 So. 2d 487, 1991 La. LEXIS 3129, 1991 WL 242137 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Otis, Oza T.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 22579-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 142,063.

Prior report: La.App., 586 So.2d 595.

Granted in part. The record indicates that the defendant was sentenced as a multiple offender under La.Rev.Stat. 15:529.1 on all three counts despite the fact that his convictions were entered on the same day and involved offenses committed in a single criminal act or episode. The case is remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration of Assignment of Error number 10, relating to defendant’s claim of excessive sentence, in light of State ex rel. Porter v. Butler, 573 So.2d 1106 (La.1991). Otherwise, the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Otis, Oza T.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 22579-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 142,063.

Prior report: La.App., 586 So.2d 595.

Granted in part. The record indicates that the defendant was sentenced as a multiple offender under La.Rev.Stat. 15:529.1 on all three counts despite the fact that his convictions were entered on the same day and involved offenses committed in a single criminal act or episode. The case is remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration of Assignment of Error number 10, relating to defendant’s claim of excessive sentence, in light of State ex rel. Porter v. Butler, 573 So.2d 1106 (La.1991). Otherwise, the application is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

589 So. 2d 487, 1991 La. LEXIS 3129, 1991 WL 242137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-otis-la-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack