State v. Osman
577 A.2d 717, 216 Conn. 801, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 302
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 299, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“ 1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the evidence adduced at trial to prove identification was sufficient to sustain, logically and beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury’s guilty verdict on first degree robbery and conspiracy to commit first degree robbery?
“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that evidence of a coparticipant’s use or threatened use of a tire iron was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction of conspiracy to commit first degree robbery, in violation of C.G.S. §§ 53a-48 and 53a-134 (a) (3), where that theory of liability was neither charged in the information nor instructed upon at trial?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Osman, 577 A.2d 717, 216 Conn. 801, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 302 (Colo. 1990).
577 A.2d 717 (State v. Osman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Osman
589 A.2d 1227 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)