State v. Osborne

771 P.2d 653, 96 Or. App. 109, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 385
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 5, 1989·No. C87-06-32983; CA A46596·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state appeals the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search incident to an arrest. The issue is whether the arresting officer had probable cause to make the arrest. The trial court granted the motion without making findings of fact, and we cannot review the claim of error. See State v. Wise, 305 Or 78, 82 n 2, 749 P2d 1179 (1988); State v. Brown, 94 Or App 567, 765 P2d 1241 (1989). Accordingly, we vacate the order of dismissal and remand for findings on the motion to suppress.

Order of dismissal and order granting motion to suppress vacated; remanded for findings on the existing record and entry of an order consistent therewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Osborne, 771 P.2d 653, 96 Or. App. 109, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 385 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

771 P.2d 653 (State v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wise
749 P.2d 1179 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Brown
765 P.2d 1241 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)