State v. . Osborne
This text of 18 N.C. 114 (State v. . Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The case is not in a state for the decision of the questions argued at the bar, as no judgment of the Superior Court, either final or interlocutory, appears upon the record. The discharge of a rule to show cause, why a new trial should not be granted, is not an interlocutory judgment within the act of 1831, ch. 34; which means a decision of the Court establishing a right of the plaintiff or disposing of some part of the defence conclusively, as that partition be made, or that the defendant answer over, or the like.
*115 The appeal must therefore be dismissed at the costs of the appellant, and the case remanded for farther proceedings to be had in the Superior Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 N.C. 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-osborne-nc-1834.