State v. Ortiz
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 Plaintiff-Appellant,
4 v. NO. 32,486
5 ANNA L. ORTIZ,
6 Defendant-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY 8 William H. Brogan, District Judge
9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Sri Mullis, Assistant Attorney General 11 Santa Fe, NM
12 for Appellant
13 Bennett J. Baur, Acting Chief Public Defender 14 Santa Fe, NM
15 for Appellee
16 MEMORANDUM OPINION
17 WECHSLER, Judge. 1 The State appeals the district court’s order dismissing the charges against
2 Defendant Anna L. Ortiz. In our notice, we proposed summary affirmance. The State
3 has responded that it will not be filing a memorandum opposing our proposal.
4 Therefore, for the reasons stated in the calendar notice, we affirm the district
5 court’s order dismissing the charges against Defendant.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 _______________________________ 8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 9 WE CONCUR:
10 __________________________________ 11 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge
12 __________________________________ 13 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ortiz (State v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.