State v. Orth

581 P.2d 953, 35 Or. App. 235, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2730
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 5, 1978·No. No. M-7-237, CA 9592·Published

Opinion

ROBERTS, J.

Defendant pled guilty to a charge of negligently wounding another. ORS 166.180.1 The district court sentenced defendant to pay a fine of $105 and imposed a 30-day suspended jail sentence and one-year probation. Defendant seeks remand for resentencing claiming that, since no culpable mental state is specified by the statute creating the offense of negligently wounding another, the offense must be a violation under ORS 161.105(2), which provides:

"(2) Notwithstanding any other existing law, and unless a statute enacted after January 1, 1972, otherwise provides, an offense defined by a statute outside the Oregon Criminal Code that requires no culpable mental state constitutes a violation.”

Defendant relies upon State v. Pierre, 30 Or App 81, 566 P2d 534 (1977), where we held that a person who was convicted under ORS 59.0552 could only be sentenced for a violation under ORS 161.635(3),3 because [238] no culpable mental state was provided for by the statute.

In the present case, however, the legislature, by using the words "failure to use ordinary care under the circumstances,” clearly intended a culpable mental state.4 ORS 161.105 does not apply.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Orth, 581 P.2d 953, 35 Or. App. 235, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2730 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).

581 P.2d 953 (State v. Orth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Pierre
566 P.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)