State v. Orth
Opinion
Defendant pled guilty to a charge of negligently wounding another. ORS 166.180.1 The district court sentenced defendant to pay a fine of $105 and imposed a 30-day suspended jail sentence and one-year probation. Defendant seeks remand for resentencing claiming that, since no culpable mental state is specified by the statute creating the offense of negligently wounding another, the offense must be a violation under ORS 161.105(2), which provides:
"(2) Notwithstanding any other existing law, and unless a statute enacted after January 1, 1972, otherwise provides, an offense defined by a statute outside the Oregon Criminal Code that requires no culpable mental state constitutes a violation.”
Defendant relies upon State v. Pierre, 30 Or App 81, 566 P2d 534 (1977), where we held that a person who was convicted under ORS 59.0552 could only be sentenced for a violation under ORS 161.635(3),3 because [238] no culpable mental state was provided for by the statute.
In the present case, however, the legislature, by using the words "failure to use ordinary care under the circumstances,” clearly intended a culpable mental state.4 ORS 161.105 does not apply.
Affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
581 P.2d 953 (State v. Orth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.