State v. Ortez
This text of 649 S.E.2d 642 (State v. Ortez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Armando ORTEZ.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Armando Ortez.
Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.
Prior report: 178 N.C.App. 236, 631 S.E.2d 188.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th day of August 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of August 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
649 S.E.2d 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ortez-nc-2007.