State v. Ortegon
613 P.2d 112, 47 Or. App. 21, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3341
This text of 613 P.2d 112 (State v. Ortegon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Ortegon, 613 P.2d 112, 47 Or. App. 21, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3341 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
Opinion
The defendant appeals his conviction of robbery in the second degree. We have examined the entire record in this case, and while some of defendant’s assignments of error do arguably have some technical merit, we conclude that any errors were not prejudicial. The evidence of defendant’s guilt was so overwelming as to require affirmance. ORS 19.125; Or Const Art VII, § 3.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 19.125
Oregon § 19.125
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
613 P.2d 112, 47 Or. App. 21, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ortegon-orctapp-1980.