State v. Ortega

CourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 8, 2015
Docket34,203
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Ortega (State v. Ortega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ortega, (N.M. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 34,203

5 JAMES A. ORTEGA,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVEZ COUNTY 8 Steven L. Bell, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 Kenneth H. Stalter, Assistant Attorney General 12 Albuquerque, NM

13 for Appellee

14 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 15 Santa Fe, NM

16 for Appellant

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 WECHSLER, Judge. 1 {1} Defendant appeals the district court's determination that his kidnapping

2 conviction is a “serious violent offense” for the purposes of the Earned Meritorious

3 Deductions Act (EMDA), NMSA 1978, § 33-2-34 (2006). We proposed to hold that

4 the district court did not provide a sufficient basis for denying credit under the

5 EMDA. The State has responded by indicating that it opposes our calendar notice only

6 to the extent that it asks us to remand for additional factfinding on the EMDA issue,

7 if appropriate. [MIO 3] We agree that remand for reconsideration of the issue is

8 appropriate. State v. Morales, 2002-NMCA-016, ¶ 19, 131 N.M. 530, 39 P.3d 747,

9 abrogated on other grounds by State v. Frawley, 2007-NMSC–057, ¶ 36, 143 N.M.

10 7, 172 P.3d 144.

11 {2} For the reasons set forth above and in our calendar notice, we reverse the

12 EMDA determination and remand this matter to the district court pursuant to Morales.

14 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

15 ________________________________ 16 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

17 WE CONCUR:

18 ________________________________ 19 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

2 1 ________________________________ 2 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Morales
2002 NMCA 016 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2001)
State v. Frawley
2007 NMSC 057 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Ortega, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ortega-nmctapp-2015.