State v. Ortega

578 S.W.3d 862
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 30, 2019
DocketWD 81859
StatusPublished

This text of 578 S.W.3d 862 (State v. Ortega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ortega, 578 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Ortega was charged in the Circuit Court of Boone County with the class B felony of possessing more than twenty images of child pornography. The State listed in the charging document twenty-five of 126 total images consisting of child pornography that had been attached to a draft email discovered in Ortega's email account. Before trial, Ortega filed a motion to redact reference to any images not specifically listed in the charging document from the video of his interview with law enforcement. The trial court overruled his motion. At trial, Ortega made no objection to the admission of the unredacted video, the admission of the draft email and the 126 attachments, or to references to the 126 images during the testimony of the investigating officer. A jury found Ortega guilty and the trial court sentenced him to ten years' imprisonment in the Department of Corrections. Ortega appeals, alleging that the trial court plainly erred by allowing the jury to hear reference to the existence of all 126 images. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for the order. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
578 S.W.3d 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ortega-moctapp-2019.