State v. Orr

500 P.3d 1290, 316 Or. App. 672
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 29, 2021·No. A172278·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Argued and submitted December 8, reversed and remanded December 29, 2021, petition for review denied May 5, 2022 (369 Or 705)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DAVID WAYNE ORR, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 19CR48594; A172278

500 P3d 1290

J. Channing Bennett, Judge. Jason E. Thompson argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Mark E. Seepe argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Joseph Callahan, Assistant Attorney General.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded.

Cite as 316 Or App 672 (2021) 673

PER CURIAM Defendant appeals judgments of conviction for first-

degree unlawful sexual penetration and first-degree sexual abuse. He raises two assignments of error. We reject his first assignment of error without written discussion. In his second assignment of error, he contends that the trial court erred by accepting nonunanimous verdicts on both counts. Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020). The state concedes that, under Ramos, the convictions must be reversed. State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 503-05, 464 P3d 1123 (2020) (acceptance of nonunanimous jury verdict is error under Ramos). We agree, accept the concession, and reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Orr, 500 P.3d 1290, 316 Or. App. 672 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

500 P.3d 1290 (State v. Orr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Granberg
500 P.3d 1290 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)