State v. Orr

2017 Ohio 552, 76 N.E.3d 1190, 149 Ohio St. 3d 633
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 22, 2017·No. No. 2015-1847·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur. Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Erika B. Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Carol Hamilton O’Brien, Delaware County Prosecuting Attorney, and Douglas N. Dumolt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Charlyn Bohland, Assistant Public Defender; National Juvenile Defender Center and Nadia Natasha Seeratan; and Juvenile Law Center and Marsha L. Levick, urging affirmance for amici curiae Office of the Ohio Public Defender, National Juvenile Defender Center, and Juvenile Law Center.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Orr, 2017 Ohio 552, 76 N.E.3d 1190, 149 Ohio St. 3d 633 (Ohio 2017).

2017 Ohio 552 (State v. Orr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Orr (Slip Opinion)
2017 Ohio 552 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2017)