State v. Orr

520 S.W.3d 826, 2017 WL 2644045, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 606
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 2017·No. No. ED 104428·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Orr (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction of one count of class B felony possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of § 195.211 (Count I) and one count of class A misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202 (Count II). Defendant claims the trial court plain[827] ly erred in admitting the substance testing conclusions of the State’s criminalist ■witness Ms. Karen Fox and her lab report concerning State’s Exhibits 1-A and 1-B. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Orr, 520 S.W.3d 826, 2017 WL 2644045, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 606 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

520 S.W.3d 826 (State v. Orr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.