State v. Orr
Opinion
ORDER
Clarence Orr (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction of one count of class B felony possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of § 195.211 (Count I) and one count of class A misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202 (Count II). Defendant claims the trial court plain[827] ly erred in admitting the substance testing conclusions of the State’s criminalist ■witness Ms. Karen Fox and her lab report concerning State’s Exhibits 1-A and 1-B. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
520 S.W.3d 826 (State v. Orr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.