State v. Orr
254 S.W.3d 918, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 780, 2008 WL 2350632
Opinion
ORDER
The defendant, Anthony Orr, appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of criminal nonsupport, Section 568.040, RSMo 2000. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Orr, 254 S.W.3d 918, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 780, 2008 WL 2350632 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
254 S.W.3d 918 (State v. Orr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chatman v. ARAMARK SCHOOLS, LLC.
254 S.W.3d 918 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)