State v. Orbea

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Orbea

207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 484, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 90

Idaho Supreme Court·Decided May 29, 1922·Published

Opinion

MCCARTHY, J.

—

The case having been set for hearing, appellant submitted no brief, or statement of points and authorities, and was not represented. The Attorney General, representing respondent, appeared and moved that the judgment be affirmed. The motion is sustained. (Rule 48; Ellsworth v. Hill, 34 Ida. 359, 200 Pac. 1067.)

Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Rice, C. J., and Budge, Dunn, and Lee, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MCCARTHY, J.

—

The case having been set for hearing, appellant submitted no brief, or statement of points and authorities, and was not represented. The Attorney General, representing respondent, appeared and moved that the judgment be affirmed. The motion is sustained. (Rule 48; Ellsworth v. Hill, 34 Ida. 359, 200 Pac. 1067.)

Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Rice, C. J., and Budge, Dunn, and Lee, JJ., concur.

State v. Orbea, 207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 484, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 90 (Idaho 1922).

Pincite

207 P. 1116 (State v. Orbea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related