State v. Orbea
207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 484, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 90
This text of 207 P. 1116 (State v. Orbea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Orbea, 207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 484, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 90 (Idaho 1922).
Opinion
—
The case having been set for hearing, appellant submitted no brief, or statement of points and authorities, and was not represented. The Attorney General, representing respondent, appeared and moved that the judgment be affirmed. The motion is sustained. (Rule 48; Ellsworth v. Hill, 34 Ida. 359, 200 Pac. 1067.)
Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ellsworth v. Hill
200 P. 1067 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
207 P. 1116, 35 Idaho 484, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-orbea-idaho-1922.