State v. Oquendo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Oquendo

627 A.2d 1127, 133 N.J. 416

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 9, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on defendant’s appeal pursuant to Rule 2:2-l(a)(2), and the Court having previously overruled the majority opinion of the Appellate Division herein, see State v. Rosado, 131 N.J. 423, 429, 621 A.2d 12, 14-15 (1993);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that so much of the judgment of the Appellate Division as denied defendant jail credit for time spent on parole is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Law Division for further proceedings consistent with Rosado, supra. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on defendant’s appeal pursuant to Rule 2:2-l(a)(2), and the Court having previously overruled the majority opinion of the Appellate Division herein, see State v. Rosado, 131 N.J. 423, 429, 621 A.2d 12, 14-15 (1993);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that so much of the judgment of the Appellate Division as denied defendant jail credit for time spent on parole is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Law Division for further proceedings consistent with Rosado, supra. Jurisdiction is not retained.

State v. Oquendo, 627 A.2d 1127, 133 N.J. 416 (N.J. 1993).

Pincite

627 A.2d 1127 (State v. Oquendo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related