State v. Ono
552 So. 2d 234, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2424, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671, 1989 WL 119081
This text of 552 So. 2d 234 (State v. Ono) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Ono, 552 So. 2d 234, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2424, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671, 1989 WL 119081 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
The State appeals a pretrial order granting appellee’s motion in limine1 to exclude from evidence ten tape recordings of telephone conversations between appellee and Kraus. Because the parties agree that Kraus consented to the taping of the calls, we reverse and remand. State v. Welker, 536 So.2d 1017 (Fla.1988); § 934.03(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1987).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Palmore
495 So. 2d 1170 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
State v. Welker
536 So. 2d 1017 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
552 So. 2d 234, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2424, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5671, 1989 WL 119081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ono-fladistctapp-1989.