State v. O'Neil

Tennessee Supreme Court

State v. O'Neil

1 Shan. Cas. 39

DecidedSeptember 15, 1850

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Shan. Cas. 39 (State v. O'Neil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. O'Neil, 1 Shan. Cas. 39 (Tenn. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

. This case is reported in Thompson’s Cases, pages 63, 63, as an oral opinion, and it is there stated that the court decided that:

INDICTMENT. For passing- counterfeit money to defraud.

An indictment for passing counterfeit money must charge that it was done with the intention to defraud the person to whom it'was passed, or it will be bad, and the judg-ment will be arrested, because of such omission. [On the subject of counterfeiting, see Code, secs. 6597-6631, and notes.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

. This case is reported in Thompson’s Cases, pages 63, 63, as an oral opinion, and it is there stated that the court decided that:

INDICTMENT. For passing- counterfeit money to defraud.

An indictment for passing counterfeit money must charge that it was done with the intention to defraud the person to whom it'was passed, or it will be bad, and the judg-ment will be arrested, because of such omission. [On the subject of counterfeiting, see Code, secs. 6597-6631, and notes.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Shan. Cas. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oneil-tenn-1850.