State v. O'Neal

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. O'Neal

709 N.E.2d 171, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1465, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1315

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 28, 1999

Docket98-147

StatusPublished

This text of 709 N.E.2d 171 (State v. O'Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. O'Neal, 709 N.E.2d 171, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1465, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1315 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-960392. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. On April 16, 1999, appellant filed a document titled “Additional Authorities To Be Relied Upon At Argument On Behalf of James Derrick O’Neal.” Appellant’s document contains more than the list of citations of additional authorities permitted by S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(7), and therefore is not in compliance with the S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(7). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s list of additional authorities be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-960392. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. On April 16, 1999, appellant filed a document titled “Additional Authorities To Be Relied Upon At Argument On Behalf of James Derrick O’Neal.” Appellant’s document contains more than the list of citations of additional authorities permitted by S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(7), and therefore is not in compliance with the S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(7). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s list of additional authorities be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

709 N.E.2d 171, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1465, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oneal-ohio-1999.