State v. One Five-Passenger Ford, License No. 14837

Supreme Court of Alabama

State v. One Five-Passenger Ford, License No. 14837

111 So. 10, 215 Ala. 435, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 527

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 13, 1927

Docket6 Div. 758.

StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 10 (State v. One Five-Passenger Ford, License No. 14837) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. One Five-Passenger Ford, License No. 14837, 111 So. 10, 215 Ala. 435, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 527 (Ala. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

*436 SAYRE, J.

By the decree in this case Hunter Armstrong, Esq., was allowed compensation for his services rendered as custodian of one Ford automobile, after its seizure by officers of the law because it had been used in the unlawful transportation of spirituous liquors, and pending the decree directing its sale. Armstrong was and is register of the court passing the decree, and doubtless that fact suggested his appointment as custodian; but his appointment was in no way dependent upon that fact. It was within the authority of the court to appoint any one else. It results, in our judgment, that the compensation awarded' to Armstrong, who is the real appellee in this case, had no necessary connection with the fact that he was register for the court, and is unaffected by legislation fixing the salary of the register in chancery for Jefferson county, or by the decision in Armstrong v. Jefferson County, 208 Ala. 645, 95 So. 89, or Waldrop v. Hehry, 207 Ala. 128, 92 So. 425. Armstrong was in every essential particular a receiver appointed by the court, and the power of the court to award him compensation for his services in that relation is not doubted. Magee v. Cowperthwaite, 10 Ala. 966.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*436 SAYRE, J.

By the decree in this case Hunter Armstrong, Esq., was allowed compensation for his services rendered as custodian of one Ford automobile, after its seizure by officers of the law because it had been used in the unlawful transportation of spirituous liquors, and pending the decree directing its sale. Armstrong was and is register of the court passing the decree, and doubtless that fact suggested his appointment as custodian; but his appointment was in no way dependent upon that fact. It was within the authority of the court to appoint any one else. It results, in our judgment, that the compensation awarded' to Armstrong, who is the real appellee in this case, had no necessary connection with the fact that he was register for the court, and is unaffected by legislation fixing the salary of the register in chancery for Jefferson county, or by the decision in Armstrong v. Jefferson County, 208 Ala. 645, 95 So. 89, or Waldrop v. Hehry, 207 Ala. 128, 92 So. 425. Armstrong was in every essential particular a receiver appointed by the court, and the power of the court to award him compensation for his services in that relation is not doubted. Magee v. Cowperthwaite, 10 Ala. 966.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 So. 10, 215 Ala. 435, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-one-five-passenger-ford-license-no-14837-ala-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack