State v. Omiecinski

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Omiecinski

914 N.E.2d 203, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1405

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Omiecinski. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 Ohio St. 3d 1533 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2009·No. 2009-0863·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 90510, 2009-Ohio-1066. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, IV, and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept Proposition of Law No. I without holding. Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III and IV only. O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III, IV, and V only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 90510, 2009-Ohio-1066. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, IV, and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept Proposition of Law No. I without holding. Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III and IV only. O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III, IV, and V only.

State v. Omiecinski, 914 N.E.2d 203, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

914 N.E.2d 203 (State v. Omiecinski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related