State v. Omiecinski

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Omiecinski

914 N.E.2d 203, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1405

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 30, 2009

Docket2009-0863

StatusPublished

This text of 914 N.E.2d 203 (State v. Omiecinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Omiecinski, 914 N.E.2d 203, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 90510, 2009-Ohio-1066. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, IV, and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept Proposition of Law No. I without holding. Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III and IV only. O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III, IV, and V only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 90510, 2009-Ohio-1066. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, IV, and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept Proposition of Law No. I without holding. Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III and IV only. O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III, IV, and V only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

914 N.E.2d 203, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-omiecinski-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack