State v. Olson
Opinion
Filed 6/11/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 144
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Jeffrey Alan Olson, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20150034
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 Second Ave. N.W., Mandan, ND 58554, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow, 411 N. 4th St., Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Olson
No. 20150034
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Jeffrey Alan Olson appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of forgery under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-24-01. Olson argues the State failed to present sufficient evidence the checks were forged or counterfeited under the definition provided to the jury and the district court erred by refusing to grant Olson’s Rule 29, N.D.R.Crim.P., motion for acquittal. We conclude sufficient evidence exists the checks were forged or counterfeited and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2015 ND 144 (State v. Olson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.