State v. Olson

196 N.W.2d 444, 293 Minn. 415, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1222
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 31, 1972·No. No. 42774·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant, who was charged with kidnapping, theft, and simple robbery, pleaded guilty to simple robbery. He appeals from that conviction, asserting for the first time on this appeal that he should be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty on the ground that the prosecution failed to fulfill its part of an alleged plea bargain with respect to the sentence imposed. Although we might infer from the proceedings that there was some form of plea bargain, the record does not disclose the terms of the agreement. We are accordingly unable to decide the question without the kind of record which an evidentiary hearing in a postconviction [416] proceeding would establish. State v. Coe, 290 Minn. 537, 188 N. W. 2d 421 (1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Olson, 196 N.W.2d 444, 293 Minn. 415, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1222 (Mich. 1972).

196 N.W.2d 444 (State v. Olson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.
289 N.W.2d 43 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1979)
Milkovich v. Saari
203 N.W.2d 408 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1973)