State v. Olmsted
Opinion
On February 20,1996, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Counts I-IV: Fifty (50) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, on each count; Count V: Six (6) months in the Missoula County Jail. All of the sentences shall run concurrently with each other.
On August 19,1999, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and represented by Herman “Chuck” Watson. The state was represented by Betty Wing.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division provides: “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (Section 45-18-904(3), MCA.) The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 19th day of August, 1999.
DATED this 9th day of September, 1999.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
298 Mont. 66 (State v. Olmsted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.