State v. Oliver

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Oliver

501 P.2d 78, 10 Or. App. 642

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 28, 1972

DocketNo. 72-20

StatusPublished

This text of 501 P.2d 78 (State v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Oliver, 501 P.2d 78, 10 Or. App. 642 (Or. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On April 18, 1972, pursuant to Notice of Mental Illness dated April 17, 1972, and the reports of two examining physicians which showed Robert Edward Oliver was hallucinating and was schizophrenic, he was committed to Oregon State Hospital as a mentally ill person. He appealed this judgment on May 16, 1972. The record discloses that the minimum due process requirements pronounced necessary in Oregon in State v. Collman, 9 Or App 476, 497 P2d 1233 (1972), were not accorded Oliver. The state has filed no brief, apparently conceding error.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On April 18, 1972, pursuant to Notice of Mental Illness dated April 17, 1972, and the reports of two examining physicians which showed Robert Edward Oliver was hallucinating and was schizophrenic, he was committed to Oregon State Hospital as a mentally ill person. He appealed this judgment on May 16, 1972. The record discloses that the minimum due process requirements pronounced necessary in Oregon in State v. Collman, 9 Or App 476, 497 P2d 1233 (1972), were not accorded Oliver. The state has filed no brief, apparently conceding error.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

501 P.2d 78, 10 Or. App. 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oliver-orctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack