State v. Oliver
This text of 2011 Ohio 3950 (State v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Oliver, 2011-Ohio-3950.]
COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
STATE OF OHIO
Plaintiff-Appellee
-vs-
KEVIN OLIVER, II
Defendant-Appellant
JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.
Case No. 11CAA020021
OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal form the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 09 CR I 09 0450
JUDGMENT: Reversed and Final Judgment Entered
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: August 8, 2011
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant
CAROL HAMILTON O'BRIEN WILLIAM T. CRAMER Delaware County Prosecuting Attorney 470 Olde Worthington Road, Suite 200 GREGORY A. TAPOCSI Westerville, Ohio 43082 Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 140 N. Sandusky St., 3rd Floor Delaware, Ohio 43015 Hoffman, P.J.
{¶1} Defendant-appellant Kevin Oliver, II appeals the sentence entered by the
Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, following his guilty plea to six counts of
burglary, two counts of attempted burglary, and one count of grand theft. Appellant was
ordered to serve a total of nine and one half years in prison in addition to other
penalties. The trial court included the following in its Judgment Entry of Sentence
entered January 28, 2011:
{¶2} “The Court does not approve the Intensive Prison Program or Transitional
Control.”
{¶3} It is from his sentencing entry Appellant prosecutes this appeal assigning
as error:
{¶4} “I. DEFENDANT’S STATE AND FEDERAL RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS
WERE VIOLATED WHEN THE TRIAL COURT DISAPPROVED TRANSITIONAL
CONTROL UNDER R.C. 2967.26 AT SENTENCE.”1
{¶5} This Court has previously addressed this exact issue in State v. Spears,
2011-Ohio-1538. Upon review we adhere to our prior precedent.
{¶6} Appellant’s sole assignment of error is sustained.
1 A rendition of the facts is unnecessary for our disposition of this appeal. {¶7} The judgment of the trial court is reversed.
By: Hoffman, P.J.
Edwards, J. and
Delaney, J. concur
s/ William B. Hoffman _________________ HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN
s/ Julie A. Edwards___________________ HON. JULIE A. EDWARDS
s/ Patricia A. Delaney _________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : : -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : KEVIN OLIVER, II : : Defendant-Appellant : Case No. 11CAA020021
For the reason stated in our accompanying Opinion, the judgment of the
Delaware County Court of Common Pleas is reversed. This Court orders the Judgment
Entry of Sentence entered by the trial court and filed on January 28, 2011, shall
constitute the final judgment of sentence with the singular exception the first full paragraph on page three thereof, which reads, “The Court does not approve the
Intensive Prison Program or Transitional Control” is ordered stricken therefrom.
s/ William B. Hoffman _________________ HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN
s/ Patricia A. Delaney HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 3950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oliver-ohioctapp-2011.