State v. Oliver

2011 Ohio 3950
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 8, 2011
Docket11CAA020021
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2011 Ohio 3950 (State v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Oliver, 2011 Ohio 3950 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Oliver, 2011-Ohio-3950.]

COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO

Plaintiff-Appellee

-vs-

KEVIN OLIVER, II

Defendant-Appellant

JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.

Case No. 11CAA020021

OPINION

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal form the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 09 CR I 09 0450

JUDGMENT: Reversed and Final Judgment Entered

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: August 8, 2011

APPEARANCES:

For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant

CAROL HAMILTON O'BRIEN WILLIAM T. CRAMER Delaware County Prosecuting Attorney 470 Olde Worthington Road, Suite 200 GREGORY A. TAPOCSI Westerville, Ohio 43082 Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 140 N. Sandusky St., 3rd Floor Delaware, Ohio 43015 Hoffman, P.J.

{¶1} Defendant-appellant Kevin Oliver, II appeals the sentence entered by the

Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, following his guilty plea to six counts of

burglary, two counts of attempted burglary, and one count of grand theft. Appellant was

ordered to serve a total of nine and one half years in prison in addition to other

penalties. The trial court included the following in its Judgment Entry of Sentence

entered January 28, 2011:

{¶2} “The Court does not approve the Intensive Prison Program or Transitional

Control.”

{¶3} It is from his sentencing entry Appellant prosecutes this appeal assigning

as error:

{¶4} “I. DEFENDANT’S STATE AND FEDERAL RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS

WERE VIOLATED WHEN THE TRIAL COURT DISAPPROVED TRANSITIONAL

CONTROL UNDER R.C. 2967.26 AT SENTENCE.”1

{¶5} This Court has previously addressed this exact issue in State v. Spears,

2011-Ohio-1538. Upon review we adhere to our prior precedent.

{¶6} Appellant’s sole assignment of error is sustained.

1 A rendition of the facts is unnecessary for our disposition of this appeal. {¶7} The judgment of the trial court is reversed.

By: Hoffman, P.J.

Edwards, J. and

Delaney, J. concur

s/ William B. Hoffman _________________ HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN

s/ Julie A. Edwards___________________ HON. JULIE A. EDWARDS

s/ Patricia A. Delaney _________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : : -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : KEVIN OLIVER, II : : Defendant-Appellant : Case No. 11CAA020021

For the reason stated in our accompanying Opinion, the judgment of the

Delaware County Court of Common Pleas is reversed. This Court orders the Judgment

Entry of Sentence entered by the trial court and filed on January 28, 2011, shall

constitute the final judgment of sentence with the singular exception the first full paragraph on page three thereof, which reads, “The Court does not approve the

Intensive Prison Program or Transitional Control” is ordered stricken therefrom.

s/ William B. Hoffman _________________ HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN

s/ Patricia A. Delaney HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Talbert
2025 Ohio 3116 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 Ohio 3950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oliver-ohioctapp-2011.