State v. . Oliver

70 N.C. 60
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by38 cases

This text of 70 N.C. 60 (State v. . Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Oliver, 70 N.C. 60 (N.C. 1874).

Opinion

Settle, J.

We may assume that the old doctrine, that a husband had a right to whip his wife', provided he used a switch no larger than his thumb, is not law in North Carolina. Indeed, the Courts have advanced from that barbarism until they have reached the position, that the husband has no right to chastise his wife, under any circumstances.

But from motives of public policy, — in order to preserve the sanctity of the domestic circle, the Courts will not listen to trivial complaints.

If no permanent injury has been inflicted, nor malice, cruelty nor dangerous violence shown by the husband, it is better *62 to draw the curtain, shut out the public gaze, and leave the parties to forget and forgive.

No general rule can be applied, but each case must depend upon the circumstances surrounding it.

Without adverting in detail to the facts established by the special verdict in this case, we think that they show both malice and cruelty.

In fact, it is difficult to conceive how a man, who has promised, upon the altar to love, comfort, honor, and keep a woman, can lay rude and violent hands upon her, without having malice and cruelty in his heart.

Let it be certified that the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Per CuriAM. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. Schmidt
440 P.3d 461 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2019)
Dechkovskaia v. Dechkovskaia
754 S.E.2d 831 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
State v. Barnes
747 S.E.2d 912 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
State v. Sherron
166 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
State v. Alford
161 S.E.2d 575 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Steele v. Steele
65 F. Supp. 329 (District of Columbia, 1946)
Hampton v. North Carolina Pulp Co.
49 F. Supp. 625 (E.D. North Carolina, 1943)
Rozell v. Rozell
256 A.D. 61 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
David v. David
157 A. 755 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1932)
Crosby v. Crosby
230 A.D. 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
La Van Allen v. Allen
159 N.E. 656 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Austin v. Austin
100 So. 591 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)
State v. Falkner
182 N.C. 793 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
Crowell v. . Crowell
105 S.E. 206 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)
Young v. Newsome
180 N.C. 315 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)
Freeman v. Belfer
173 N.C. 581 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
In re Fain
172 N.C. 790 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
State v. Mincher
172 N.C. 895 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
State v. . Nipper
81 S.E. 164 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Howell v. . Howell
78 S.E. 222 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 N.C. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oliver-nc-1874.