State v. Oliver

482 S.W.3d 828, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 205, 2016 WL 873231
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 8, 2016
DocketWD 78368
StatusPublished

This text of 482 S.W.3d 828 (State v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Oliver, 482 S.W.3d 828, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 205, 2016 WL 873231 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

.Order

Per Curiam

Eric Oliver appeals his conviction for sale of a controlled substance. He contends:. (1) the circuit court erred in excluding testimony from his rebuttal witnesses, and (2) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. - For reasons explained in a memorandum provided to the parties, we find, no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
482 S.W.3d 828, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 205, 2016 WL 873231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oliver-moctapp-2016.