State v. Oliphant

837 A.2d 1089, 178 N.J. 245, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 1566
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 25, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s petition for certification is granted, limited solely to a claim that NERA should not apply to his conviction for second-degree robbery; and it is further

ORDERED that the judgment of the Appellate Division in respect of that issue is summarily reversed,, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for an amendment of the judgment of [246] conviction to remove the NERA component of defendant’s sentence for second-degree robbery.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN and WALLACE join in this decision.

Justice VERNIERO did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Oliphant, 837 A.2d 1089, 178 N.J. 245, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 1566 (N.J. 2003).

837 A.2d 1089 (State v. Oliphant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)