State v. Olenick
918 A.2d 273, 281 Conn. 920
This text of 918 A.2d 273 (State v. Olenick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Olenick, 918 A.2d 273, 281 Conn. 920 (Colo. 2007).
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Michael OLENICK III.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Donald R. Beebe, Norwich, and Sarah J. Schlechtweg, in support of the petition.
*274 Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn.App. 638, 910 A.2d 1002 (2006), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Olenick
910 A.2d 1002 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
918 A.2d 273, 281 Conn. 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-olenick-conn-2007.