State v. Olcese

937 N.E.2d 116, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1436
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 19, 2010·No. 2010-1818·Published

Opinion

Portage App. No. 2010-P-0045. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due November 8, 2010, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motions to stay the court of appeals’ judgment and to challenge subject matter jurisdiction,

It is ordered by the court that the motions are denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Olcese, 937 N.E.2d 116, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1436 (Ohio 2010).

937 N.E.2d 116 (State v. Olcese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.