State v. O'Lacy

Supreme Court of Iowa

State v. O'Lacy

7 N.W. 646, 55 Iowa 749

DecidedDecember 18, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.W. 646 (State v. O'Lacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. O'Lacy, 7 N.W. 646, 55 Iowa 749 (iowa 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Adams, Ch. J.

— The defendant complains that the judgment is excessive, and that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence.

The evidence tends to show that the burglary was committed by the defendant, and one John Poster. In the case of The State v. Foster, decided at the present term, we held that the judgment was not excessive and that the verdict was sustained by the evidence. Judgment of imprisonment for the same length of time was rendered against Poster, and the evidence against him was substantially the same as the evidence against the defendant. In our opinion the court did not err, and the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams, Ch. J.

— The defendant complains that the judgment is excessive, and that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence.

The evidence tends to show that the burglary was committed by the defendant, and one John Poster. In the case of The State v. Foster, decided at the present term, we held that the judgment was not excessive and that the verdict was sustained by the evidence. Judgment of imprisonment for the same length of time was rendered against Poster, and the evidence against him was substantially the same as the evidence against the defendant. In our opinion the court did not err, and the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.W. 646, 55 Iowa 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-olacy-iowa-1880.