State v. Ojeda

712 So. 2d 480, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8154, 1998 WL 374758
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 1998·No. No. 97-3052·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At the time of the order granting Appel-lee’s writ of error coram nobis, the trial judge did not have the benefit of Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(en banc). Under the authority of Peart, we reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ojeda, 712 So. 2d 480, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8154, 1998 WL 374758 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

712 So. 2d 480 (State v. Ojeda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peart v. State
705 So. 2d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)