State v. O.I.W.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. O.I.W.

616 So. 2d 638, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1993 WL 130564

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 27, 1993

DocketNos. 92-922, 92-831, 92-826, 92-672 and 92-484

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 638 (State v. O.I.W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. O.I.W., 616 So. 2d 638, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1993 WL 130564 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the state’s motion to dismiss its appeals as to appellees D.G.C. and O.I.W. As to the remaining two appellees, V.M.B., and A.D., we affirm the orders expunging and sealing their records, § 943.058, Fla.Stat. (1991); see Babun v. State, 576 So.2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Murphy v. State, 363 So.2d 581 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), without prejudice to the state commencing any appropriate action in the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant the state’s motion to dismiss its appeals as to appellees D.G.C. and O.I.W. As to the remaining two appellees, V.M.B., and A.D., we affirm the orders expunging and sealing their records, § 943.058, Fla.Stat. (1991); see Babun v. State, 576 So.2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Murphy v. State, 363 So.2d 581 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), without prejudice to the state commencing any appropriate action in the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 638, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1993 WL 130564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oiw-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack