State v. O.I.W.
616 So. 2d 638, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1993 WL 130564
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 1993·No. Nos. 92-922, 92-831, 92-826, 92-672 and 92-484·Published
Opinion
We grant the state’s motion to dismiss its appeals as to appellees D.G.C. and O.I.W. As to the remaining two appellees, V.M.B., and A.D., we affirm the orders expunging and sealing their records, § 943.058, Fla.Stat. (1991); see Babun v. State, 576 So.2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Murphy v. State, 363 So.2d 581 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), without prejudice to the state commencing any appropriate action in the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. O.I.W., 616 So. 2d 638, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1993 WL 130564 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
616 So. 2d 638 (State v. O.I.W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Babun v. State
576 So. 2d 377 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Murphy v. State
363 So. 2d 581 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)